Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of third-generation cephalosporins or piperacillin compared with cefepime or carbapenems for severe infections caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: A multi-centre retrospective propensity-weighted study.

Authors :
Maillard, Alexis
Delory, Tristan
Bernier, Juliette
Villa, Antoine
Chaibi, Khalil
Escaut, Lélia
Contejean, Adrien
Bercot, Beatrice
Robert, Jérôme
El Alaoui, Fatma
Tankovic, Jacques
Poupet, Hélène
Cuzon, Gaëlle
Lafaurie, Matthieu
Surgers, Laure
Joseph, Adrien
Paccoud, Olivier
Molina, Jean-Michel
Bleibtreu, Alexandre
Source :
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. Jul2023, Vol. 62 Issue 1, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

• The best therapy for wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales is uncertain. • There was no significant difference in mortality between the study treatment groups: third-generation cephalosporin (3GC), piperacillin ± tazobactam, or cefepime/carbapenem (primary endpoint). • Both 3GC and piperacillin ± tazobactam may increase treatment failure due to AmpC-overproduction (secondary endpoint). The optimal treatment regimen for infections caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales remains controversial. This study compared the outcomes of bloodstream infections (BSI) and pneumonia according to the type of definitive antibiotic therapy: third-generation cephalosporin (3GC), piperacillin ± tazobactam, cefepime or carbapenem. All cases of BSI and pneumonia caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales over 2 years in eight university hospitals were reviewed. Patients who received definitive therapy consisting of either a 3GC (3GC group), piperacillin ± tazobactam (piperacillin group), or cefepime or a carbapenem (reference group) were included in this study. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was treatment failure due to infection by emerging AmpC-overproducing strains. Propensity-score-based models were used to balance confounding factors between groups. In total, 575 patients were included in this study: 302 (52%) with pneumonia and 273 (48%) with BSI. Half (n =271, 47%) received cefepime or a carbapenem as definitive therapy, 120 (21%) received a 3GC, and 184 (32%) received piperacillin ± tazobactam. Compared with the reference group, 30-day mortality was similar in the 3GC [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–1.31)] and piperacillin (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 0.86–1.66) groups. The likelihood of treatment failure was higher in the 3GC (aHR 6.81, 95% CI 3.76–12.4) and piperacillin (aHR 3.13, 95% CI 1.69–5.80) groups. The results were similar when stratifying the analysis on pneumonia or BSI. Treatment of included BSI or pneumonia caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with 3GC or piperacillin ± tazobactam was not associated with higher mortality, but was associated with increased risk of AmpC overproduction leading to treatment failure compared with cefepime or a carbapenem. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09248579
Volume :
62
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164345304
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106809