Fair execution costs?

The area of executions undoubtedly involves an area of law that is inconvenient and conflicting for the average person. The negative emotions accompanying the entire procedure are logically reflected in the impression of general injustice in the amount of costs covered. On the one hand, there is the creditor who, despite having an execution title (for example), has not been paid, the debtor who does not want to or cannot pay, and last but not least, the executor, who is obliged to demand compliance from the debtor. For this activity, the costs certainly belong to him -- fair for all parties. Although since the beginning of the existence of executors there have been enough regulations that determine costs in advance, life and application practice have brought new challenges and changes. The balance between the parties and the objective in the form of fairly determined costs of execution, these are the constants of the promises of each new ruling party. But what are the costs of enforcement today? Can they be considered fair? I try to answer this question in this post. The article summarizes the current state, attempts to define the problems of current application practice and looks for possible causes of these problems [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]