Cascadia Subduction Zone Fault Heterogeneities From Newly Detected Small Magnitude Earthquakes.

The Cascadia subduction zone (CSZ) is known to host M9 megathrust ruptures; however, no such event has occurred in historical observation. The distribution and characteristics of small‐ to moderate‐sized earthquakes can be used to determine the behavior of the megathrust fault but are notably absent offshore the CSZ due to the distance from onshore seismometers. We use automated subspace detection coupled with an onshore‐offshore seismic deployment to find small‐magnitude earthquakes in the offshore seismogenic zone and analyze their locations in the context of interseismic locking and seismogenic zone extent. We detected and located 5,282 earthquakes, 4,096 of which had been previously undetected. We find that the downdip extent of the seismogenic zone as defined by interplate seismicity agrees with the 20% locking contour of the Schmalzle et al. (2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GC005172) geodetic model and extends deeper than predicted by previous thermal models. We cannot determine the updip extent of the seismogenic zone; this may be due to a lack of templates for detection in the updip source area, stress shadows updip of asperity loading, and/or strong locking to the trench. We present a map of possible asperities determined by the small earthquakes in this study. Our asperity locations and extents show some, but not complete, agreement with the asperities modeled from the 1700 M9 rupture and geodetic locking models, and good agreement with the paleo‐rupture extents determined from offshore turbidites and forearc basin‐based asperity estimates. This highlights the need of continued offshore observations over time, and to elucidate fine‐scale variation in locking. Plain Language Summary: Subduction zones host the world's largest earthquakes, with many subduction zones capable of M9 megathrust ruptures. The size and ground motion of these great earthquakes depend on how much of the fault slips seismically and the portions of the fault that promote stronger plate locking between earthquake ruptures. Great earthquakes are known to have occurred in the Cascadia subduction zone, the most recent of which was a M9 in 1700. Despite the geologic evidence for these past great earthquakes, there are no historical observations of large‐ to great‐earthquakes to directly assess where the fault slips seismically or is strongly locked. Additionally, few interplate earthquakes have been observed along this plate boundary. We use a data set acquired with temporary ocean‐bottom seismometers and coastal land‐based seismometers to search for interplate earthquakes that were missed using land seismic stations alone, due to their location primarily offshore. We use the locations of these newly detected earthquakes to map seismogenic extent on the plate boundary and areas of strong plate locking, which will produce higher energy release during an earthquake rupture. Key Points: We develop an earthquake catalog using an amphibious data set and subspace detection targeting Cascadia subduction zone interplate eventsLocations of interplate seismicity detected in this study are used to delineate downdip extent of the seismogenic zone and asperity distributionAsperities agree somewhat with models of geodetic locking and 1700 M9 asperities, and closely match paleo‐rupture extents and forearc basins [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]