Back to Search
Start Over
High‐'n'‐dry? A comparison of cannabis and alcohol use in drivers presenting to hospital after a vehicular collision.
- Source :
-
Addiction . Aug2023, Vol. 118 Issue 8, p1507-1516. 10p. 3 Charts, 2 Graphs. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Design: This was a prospective observational study. Background and Aims: The characteristics of cannabis‐involved motor vehicle collisions are poorly understood. This study of injured drivers identifies demographic and collision characteristics associated with high tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrations. Setting: The study was conducted in 15 Canadian trauma centres between January 2018 and December 2021. Cases The cases (n = 6956) comprised injured drivers who required blood testing as part of routine trauma care. Measurements We quantified whole blood THC and blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and recorded driver sex, age and postal code, time of crash, crash type and injury severity. We defined three driver groups: high THC (THC ≥ 5 ng/ml and BAC = 0), high alcohol (BAC ≥ 0.08% and THC = 0) and THC/BAC‐negative (THC = 0 = BAC). We used logistic regression techniques to identify factors associated with group membership. Findings Most injured drivers (70.2%) were THC/BAC‐negative; 1274 (18.3%) had THC > 0, including 186 (2.7%) in the high THC group; 1161 (16.7%) had BAC > 0, including 606 (8.7%) in the high BAC group. Males and drivers aged less than 45 years had higher adjusted odds of being in the high THC group (versus the THC/BAC‐negative group). Importantly, 4.6% of drivers aged less than 19 years had THC ≥ 5 ng/ml, and drivers aged less than 19 years had higher unadjusted odds of being in the high THC group than drivers aged 45–54 years. Males, drivers aged 19–44 years, rural drivers, seriously injured drivers and drivers injured in single‐vehicle, night‐time or weekend collisions had higher adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for being in the high alcohol group (versus THC/BAC‐negative). Drivers aged less than 35 or more than 65 years and drivers involved in multi‐vehicle, daytime or weekday collisions had higher adjusted odds for being in the high THC group (versus the high BAC group). Conclusions: In Canada, risk factors for cannabis‐related motor vehicle collisions appear to differ from those for alcohol‐related motor vehicle collisions. The collision factors associated with alcohol (single‐vehicle, night‐time, weekend, rural, serious injury) are not associated with cannabis‐related collisions. Demographic factors (young drivers, male drivers) are associated with both alcohol and cannabis‐related collisions, but are more strongly associated with cannabis‐related collisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *INJURY risk factors
*TRAFFIC accidents
*SCIENTIFIC observation
*TRAUMA centers
*AGE distribution
*TIME
*SEVERITY of illness index
*SEX distribution
*AUTOMOBILE driving
*ALCOHOL drinking
*HOSPITAL care
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*RESEARCH funding
*CANNABINOIDS
*BLOOD testing
*PATIENT care
*ALCOHOLS (Chemical class)
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
*ODDS ratio
*LONGITUDINAL method
*RURAL population
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09652140
- Volume :
- 118
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Addiction
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 164656271
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16186