Perceived Factors That Facilitate or Prevent the Use of Speech-Generating Devices in Bilingual Individuals With Aphasia.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore practicing speech-language pathologists’ (SLPs’) perceptions of factors that could facilitate or prevent the use of speech-generating devices (SGDs) in bilingual individuals with aphasia. Specifically, this exploratory study sought to identify the facilitators and barriers to SGD use in individuals with culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Method: An online survey was distributed to SLPs through an e-mail listserv and social media of an augmentative and alternative communication company. This article focused on the results of the survey items related to (a) the presence of bilingual individuals with aphasia on an SLP’s caseload, (b) training related to SGD or bilingual aphasia, and (c) barriers and facilitators to SGD use. A thematic analysis was conducted to analyze the barriers and facilitators to SGD use reported by the respondents. Results: A total of 274 SLPs who met the inclusion criteria had experience in implementing SGD for people with aphasia. Regarding relevant training, our results indicated that very few SLPs received bilingual aphasia intervention training (17.22%) or bilingual SGD training (0.56%) in graduate school. The results from our thematic analysis revealed four major themes of barriers and facilitators to SGD use, including (a) hardware and software, (b) cultural and language content, (c) SLP’s cultural and linguistic competency, and (d) resources. Conclusions: Practicing SLPs reported several barriers to SGD use in bilinguals with aphasia. Most notably, language barriers for monolingual SLPs were seen as the greatest barrier to language recovery in individuals with aphasia whose primary language is not English. Several other barriers were consistent with previous research, such as financial factors and insurance disparities. The top three most important factors that facilitate SGD use in bilinguals with aphasia, as identified by the respondents, include user-friendly symbol organization, personalized words, and ease of programming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]