Back to Search Start Over

A less invasive operative method using a medial cannulated cancellous screw and single plate fixation for the treatment of transcondylar fracture of the humerus in elderly patients in multicenter (TRON group) study.

Authors :
Tanaka, Kohei
Takegami, Yasuhiko
Tokutake, Katsuhiro
Oshika, Yasutaka
Iwase, Kenya
Yokoyama, Hiroki
Taguchi, Katsuhiro
Imagama, Shiro
Source :
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. Aug2023, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p2481-2487. 7p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Double plate fixation for transcondylar fracture (TCF) tends to be more invasive to the soft tissue, and often carries a higher risk of postoperative complications, including ulnar nerve neuropathy. This study presents the outcomes of TCF of the distal humerus between patients treated with a single plate and cannulated cancellous screw fixation and patients treated with double plate fixation. Methods: Between 2011 and 2021, 371 cases involving treatment of distal humeral fracture were recorded in our multicenter (named TRON group) database. Patients of ≥ 65 years of age with TCF treated with opeb n reduction and internal fixation were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Mayo elbow performance score, range of motion, and total elbow arc joint. Complications included fracture-related infection (FRI) and ulnar neuropathy. Results: There were significant differences in the average operative time (CCS group vs. Plate group: 119.0 min vs. 186.5 min; p < 0.001) and average tourniquet time (CCS group vs. Plate group: 91.5 min vs. 121.0 min; p < 0.001). FRI occurred as a complication in the Plate group (n = 6). The rates of FRI did not differ to a statistically significant extent (CCS group vs. Plate group: 0% vs. 9.2%; p = 0.477). No patients underwent reoperation. The rate of sensory symptoms in the Plate group was higher than that in the CCS group (CCS group: none [n = 25], numbness [n = 1] vs. Plate group: none [n = 57], numbness [n = 15], sensory depression [n = 2]; p = 0.039). Discussion: Among patients of ≥ 65 years of age with TCF, the clinical outcomes of patients treated with medial CCS and lateral/posterolateral plate did not differ from those of patients who received double plate fixation, and the former treatment was associated with significantly fewer complications, including ulnar nerve palsy. In addition to double plate fixation, this less invasive method of medial CCS and single plate fixation should be considered as a treatment option for TCF in elderly patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16338065
Volume :
33
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
166735818
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03464-z