Impact of Social Buffering and Restraint on Welfare Indicators during UK Commercial Horse Slaughter.

Simple Summary: Retrospective CCTV footage was analysed by trained observers to assess the welfare of horses co-slaughtered with a conspecific present or slaughtered individually, restrained or unrestrained. Co-slaughtered horses were found to move around the kill pen more but were less likely to slip/fall in the pen. Both individually slaughtered horses and loose (unrestrained) horses were more likely to show agitated behaviour and resist entry to the pen, with unrestrained horses also showing increased agonistic behaviour towards abattoir personnel. Horses showed affiliative behaviour towards each other when co-slaughtered, with the shooting of the first horse seldom eliciting a startled response from the second horse. This study shows that enabling abattoirs to co-slaughter unrestrained horses could minimise stress and maximise both human safety and horse welfare. The results of this study are relevant on a wider scale, with countries across the world slaughtering high numbers of unhandled or semi-feral horses, and encourage further research to guide welfare improvements in this area. Current legislation in the United Kingdom stipulates that horses should not be slaughtered within sight of one another. However, abattoir personnel anecdotally report that, for semi-feral horses unused to restraint, co-slaughtering alongside a conspecific could reduce distress through social buffering and improve safety, but there is a lack of evidence to support this. CCTV footage from an English abattoir was assessed retrospectively with welfare indicators from when horses entered the kill pen until they were killed. Of 256 horses analysed, 12% (32/256) were co-slaughtered (alongside a conspecific) and 88% (224/256) individually. Co-slaughtered horses moved more in the pen, but individually slaughtered horses showed more agitated behaviour, required more encouragement to enter the kill pen, and experienced more slips or falls. Unrestrained horses (40%; 102/256) showed increased agitation, movement, and agonistic behaviour towards the operator and resisted entry to the kill pen compared to restrained horses (60%; 154/256). Positive interactions between conspecifics were seen in 94% (30/32) of co-slaughtered horses, and only 6% (1/16) showed a startled response to the first horse being shot, with a median time of 15 s between shots. This study highlights the impact that both conspecific and human interactions can have on equine welfare at slaughter. Semi-feral or unrestrained horses appear to experience increased distress compared to horses more familiar with human handling, and the presence of a conspecific at slaughter mitigated this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]