Multi-hazard assessment of transmission line systems subjected to independent non-concurrent turbulent winds and ground accelerations.

The design of transmission lines is based on the Load and Resistance Factor Design approach, considering that their collapse limit state is governed by climatic actions (wind and ice). Even so, accident reports indicate the regular observation of moderate to severe damage of towers after strong ground motions, affecting the structure's capacity to withstand future load events. Therefore, integrating the concepts of Performance-Based and Multi-Hazard Design, successfully applied to buildings and still embryonic to transmission lines, seems to be promising. With such performance-based multi-hazard approaches, intermediate performances can be evaluated even when they are controlled by a non-dominant hazard. Hence, the present paper aims at performing an original multi-hazard assessment of a Chilean 230kV transmission line segment. For this purpose, direct geometric and material nonlinear time history analysis, using a finite element suitable for eccentrically loaded angle profiles (L-shaped cross-sections), is employed to construct the fragility curves. In addition, uncertainties in loads and material properties are accounted for to address the transmission line system failure probability. In the existing literature, fragility analysis has been performed through pushover approaches, whereas reliability has been assessed for a single structure rather than for the transmission line system, as recommended by line codes. Contrary to design practice, the results show that seismic loads control all limit states in TLs located from central to northern Chile. Numerical results presented in this paper are based on 5000 h of total computation time. • Seismic + wind multi-hazard assessment of full transmission line segment. • Performance-based approach considering multi-hazard curves. • Direct geometric and material nonlinear time history analysis performed. • Several locations in Chile considered; for some locations. • Collapse LS controlled by wind, but serviceability and damage LS controlled by seismic actions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]