Back to Search Start Over

Differential Insurance Plan Coverage and Surgeon Reimbursement of Pediatric Circumcision at an Urban, Midwestern Hospital.

Authors :
Kamanzi, Sophia N.
Walton, Ryan F.
Rosoklija, Ilina
Corona, Lauren E.
Holl, Jane L.
Johnson, Emilie K.
Source :
Urology. Sep2023, Vol. 179, p143-150. 8p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

To explore private vs public pediatric circumcision insurance coverage and surgeon reimbursement. A telephone survey about circumcision coverage (Current Procedural Terminology codes: 54150, 54161) was conducted in October 2021 with insurance plan representatives from the 12 plans that comprised ≥1% of institutional pediatric urology visits to compare plan characteristics and coverage details. Circumcision billing data were collected at one pediatric hospital to assess surgeon reimbursement (insurance + patient payment) by plan type using bivariate statistics. Ten plans (5 private and 5 public) responded (83.3% response rate). All except one public plan covered newborn circumcision. For non-newborn circumcisions, most public plans (80%) had unrestricted coverage, whereas all private plans required medical necessity. Median reimbursement for newborn circumcision (CPT: 54150) was $484 for private and $78 for public plans, P <.001 while median reimbursement for non-newborn circumcision (CPT: 54161) was $314 for private and $147 for public plans, P <.001. Private insurance plans reimburse significantly more than public plans for newborn circumcision. For non-newborn circumcision, private plans reimburse more than public but the coverage is more restricted, with a smaller differential between newborn and non-newborn circumcision. This coverage and reimbursement structure may indirectly encourage newborn circumcision for privately insured boys and non-newborn circumcision for publicly insured boys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00904295
Volume :
179
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
172774214
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.031