Back to Search Start Over

Competition‐induced tree mortality across Europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought.

Authors :
Kulha, Niko
Honkaniemi, Juha
Barrere, Julien
Brandl, Susanne
Cordonnier, Thomas
Korhonen, Kari T.
Kunstler, Georges
Paul, Carola
Reineking, Björn
Peltoniemi, Mikko
Source :
Journal of Ecology. Oct2023, Vol. 111 Issue 10, p2310-2323. 14p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Forest stand densities are increasing in the boreal and temperate biomes, suggesting that tree‐tree competition is intensifying. Anticipating the consequences of this intensified competition is difficult because competition‐induced mortality may depend not only on the occurrence of extreme climatic events such as drought, but also on stand composition, since tree species differ in their ability to compete and tolerate competition. A better understanding of the effects of stand composition and drought on competition‐induced mortality would help to anticipate future changes in forest ecosystems.We studied the tree‐level probability of competition‐induced mortality using National Forest Inventory data from three European countries (Finland, France and Germany), covering a latitudinal gradient from the Mediterranean to the Arctic. We investigated how (i) the proportion of conspecifics, (ii) the shade tolerance (ST) of the focal tree and its competitors and (iii) drought events modify the effect of competition on tree mortality. We used a generalized linear mixed model on a dataset of 461,109 trees representing 39 species on 48,088 individual plots.Competition, measured as the basal area of larger trees, was a stronger driver of background mortality (BM) than tree size and climate. A higher proportion of conspecifics increased the competition effect on mortality, showing that conspecific individuals had a higher competitive effect compared to heterospecific individuals. The competition effect on mortality also increased as a function of the ST of neighbouring trees, suggesting an increased shading effect. A higher ST of a focal tree decreased the competition effect on mortality. Drought anomalies increased the competition effect, resulting in a higher mortality probability for the most suppressed trees.Synthesis. Competition was the main driver of background mortality. Increasing stand density increased competition‐induced tree mortality in both monospecific and mixed stands, but to different extents depending on the proportion of conspecifics and tree species shade tolerance (ST). Drought periods increase mortality, especially among the most suppressed trees, suggesting an interaction between competitive status and drought. Incorporating more detailed information on stand composition and tree species ST into tree mortality models will improve our understanding of forest dynamics in a changing climate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00220477
Volume :
111
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Ecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
172782243
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14184