Back to Search Start Over

Clinical outcomes following observation, post-operative radiation therapy, or post-operative chemoradiation for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors :
Singh, Raj
Song, Shiyu
Source :
Oral Oncology. Nov2023, Vol. 146, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

• A significant proportion of patients with HPV-associated OP-SCCs and IRFs/HRFs following surgery did not receive PORT or POCRT. • Lack of receipt of PORT or POCRT for both IRF and HRFs was associated with inferior OS. • No difference in OS was noted between PORT and POCRT for patients with HRFs. Intermediate and high-risk features (IRFs/HRFs) for locoregional recurrence following initial surgery for oropharyngeal SCCs (OP-SCCs) were defined prior to the known association of HPV with OP-SCC. There are limited reports on practice patterns and outcomes associated with post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) or chemoradiation (POCRT) for HPV-associated OP-SCCs. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with HPV-associated OP-SCCs managed initially with surgery with IRFs or HRFs. IRFs were defined as pT3/T4 disease, pN1-3 disease, and lymphovascular space invasion, and HRFs as positive margins and extranodal extension (ENE). Patients were stratified into no adjuvant therapy, PORT, or POCRT arms. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized for comparison of overall survival (OS) between treatment arms followed by a Cox multivariate (MVA) proportional-hazards model and propensity score analyses with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). We identified 6,301 patients; 51.2% had IRFs only and 48.8% had HRFs. Regarding treatment, 25.5%, 38.2%, and 36.3% of patients received no RT, PORT, and POCRT, respectively. Patients with IRFs who did not receive RT or CRT had inferior 8-year OS (81.1% vs. 87.8%; p < 0.001) that remained significant on IPTW MVA (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.69 (95% CI: 1.27–2.24; p < 0.001). Among patients with HRFs, 8-year OS was not significantly different between patients receiving PORT vs. POCRT (77.3% vs. 79.2%; p = 0.22) that remained insignificant on IPTW MVA (HR = 0.91(0.72–1.17); p = 0.48). A significant proportion of HPV-associated OP-SCC patients with IRFs or HRFs did not receive PORT, which was associated with inferior OS. We did not demonstrate with statistical power that POCRT vs. PORT was associated with superior OS in patients with HRFs, though prospective studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13688375
Volume :
146
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Oral Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
173010981
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106493