Effect of Regional Marine Cloud Brightening Interventions on Climate Tipping Elements.

It has been proposed that increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) driven climate tipping point risks may prompt consideration of solar radiation modification (SRM) climate intervention to reduce those risks. Here, we study marine cloud brightening (MCB) SRM interventions in three subtropical oceanic regions using Community Earth System Model 2 experiments. We assess the MCB impact on tipping element‐related metrics to estimate the extent to which such interventions might reduce tipping element risks. Both the pattern and magnitude of the MCB cooling depend strongly on location of the MCB intervention. We find the MCB cooling effect reduces most tipping element impacts; though differences in MCB versus GHG climate response patterns mean MCB is an imperfect remedy. However, MCB applied in certain regions may exacerbate certain GHG tipping element impacts. Thus, it is crucial to carefully consider the pattern of MCB interventions and their teleconnected responses to avoid unintended climate effects. Plain Language Summary: Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is a proposal to spray sea salt particles into clouds over oceans to increase the reflection of sunlight by the clouds, thus cooling the surface. If greenhouse gas warming continues, technologies like MCB might be considered to avoid climate change impacts such as climate system tipping points. Here, we use state‐of‐the‐art climate model experiments to analyze the MCB impact on elements of the climate system that may have tipping points. In this model, MCB reduces risks for most tipping elements considered here, such as by reducing coral reef heat stress and increasing Atlantic overturning circulation. However, the impact of MCB depends on where it is applied and in some cases adds to GHG impacts, meaning the location of MCB deployments must be carefully considered to avoid unintended regional climate effects. Key Points: The magnitude and pattern of marine cloud brightening (MCB) climate impacts depend strongly on the location of the interventionWe find MCB impacts that have qualitative similarities to prior work, but there are discrepancies that suggest key inter‐model uncertaintiesMCB simulations generally show reduced tipping element risk overall, but certain MCB patterns may exacerbate some tipping element changes [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]