Back to Search Start Over

Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors :
Watanabe, Hirotoshi
Morimoto, Takeshi
Natsuaki, Masahiro
Yamamoto, Ko
Obayashi, Yuki
Nishikawa, Ryusuke
Ando, Kenji
Ono, Koh
Kadota, Kazushige
Suwa, Satoru
Morishima, Itsuro
Yoshida, Ruka
Hata, Yoshiki
Akao, Masaharu
Yagi, Masahiro
Suematsu, Nobuhiro
Morino, Yoshihiro
Yokomatsu, Takafumi
Takamisawa, Itaru
Noda, Toshiyuki
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). Jan2024, Vol. 83 Issue 1, p17-31. 15p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

It remains unclear whether clopidogrel is better suited than aspirin as the long-term antiplatelet monotherapy following dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study compared clopidogrel monotherapy following 1 month of DAPT (clopidogrel group) with aspirin monotherapy following 12 months of DAPT (aspirin group) after PCI for 5 years. STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy 2) is a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in Japan. Patients who underwent PCI with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents were randomized in a 1-to-1 fashion either to clopidogrel or aspirin groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite stent thrombosis) or major bleeding (TIMI major or minor bleeding). Among 3,005 study patients (age: 68.6 ± 10.7 years; women: 22.3%; acute coronary syndrome: 38.3%), 2,934 patients (97.6%) completed the 5-year follow-up (adherence to the study drugs at 395 days: 84.7% and 75.9%). The clopidogrel group compared with the aspirin group was noninferior but not superior for the primary endpoint (11.75% and 13.57%, respectively; HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70-1.05; P noninferiority < 0.001; P superiority = 0.13), whereas it was superior for the cardiovascular outcomes (8.61% and 11.05%, respectively; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.97; P = 0.03) and not superior for major bleeding (4.44% and 4.92%, respectively; HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.64-1.25; P = 0.51). By the 1-year landmark analysis, clopidogrel was numerically, but not significantly, superior to aspirin for cardiovascular events (6.79% and 8.68%, respectively; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59-1.01; P = 0.06) without difference in major bleeding (3.99% and 3.32%, respectively; HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.84-1.81; P = 0.31). Clopidogrel might be an attractive alternative to aspirin with a borderline ischemic benefit beyond 1 year after PCI. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
83
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174338764
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.013