Back to Search Start Over

Contemporary Management and Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors :
Kobayashi, Taisei
Pugliese, Steven
Sethi, Sanjum S.
Parikh, Sahil A.
Goldberg, Joshua
Alkhafan, Fahad
Vitarello, Clara
Rosenfield, Kenneth
Lookstein, Robert
Keeling, Brent
Klein, Andrew
Gibson, C. Michael
Glassmoyer, Lauren
Khandhar, Sameer
Secemsky, Eric
Giri, Jay
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). Jan2024, Vol. 83 Issue 1, p35-43. 9p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Contemporary care patterns/outcomes in high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients are unknown. This study sought to characterize the management of high-risk PE patients and identify factors associated with poor outcomes. A retrospective analysis of the PERT (Pulmonary Embolism Response Team) Consortium Registry was performed. Patients presenting with intermediate-risk PE, high-risk PE, and catastrophic PE (those with hemodynamic collapse) were identified. Patient characteristics were compared with chi-square testing for categorical covariates and Student's t -test for continuous covariates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between clinical characteristics and outcomes in the high-risk population. Of 5,790 registry patients, 2,976 presented with intermediate-risk PE and 1,442 with high-risk PE. High-risk PE patients were more frequently treated with advanced therapies than intermediate-risk PE patients (41.9% vs 30.2%; P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality (20.6% vs 3.7%; P < 0.001) and major bleeding (10.5% vs. 3.5%; P < 0.001) were more common in high-risk PE. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated vasopressor use (OR: 4.56; 95% CI: 3.27-6.38; P < 0.01), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use (OR: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.12-7.30; P = 0.03), identified clot-in-transit (OR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.13-4.52; P = 0.02), and malignancy (OR: = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.13-2.56; P = 0.01) as factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Catastrophic PE patients (n = 197 [13.7% of high-risk PE patients]) had higher in-hospital mortality (42.1% vs 17.2%; P < 0.001) than those presenting with noncatastrophic high-risk PE. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (13.3% vs. 4.8% P < 0.001) and systemic thrombolysis (25% vs 11.3%; P < 0.001) were used more commonly in catastrophic PE. In the largest analysis of high-risk PE patients to date, mortality rates were high with the worst outcomes among patients with hemodynamic collapse. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
83
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174338769
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.026