Back to Search Start Over

Varying mobility adaptation to COVID-19 of residents in urban villages and commodity housing communities: A quasi-experimental analysis in Shenzhen, China.

Authors :
Zhang, Wenjia
Li, Chonglei
Source :
Cities. Feb2024, Vol. 145, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Although studies have explored the travel behavior of residents in informal housing communities in recent years, few have been conducted in the context of a time series before and after the outbreak of COVID-19. This paper tracks individual-level daily mobility response for three months, using an interrupted time series (ITS) quasi-experimental design to infer daily causal effects of COVID-19 and community close-off management on individuals' daily travel distances. This study compares the mobility response to COVID-19 between people living in urban villages and commodity housing communities in Shenzhen, China. The results reveal that urban village residents reduced their travel less, with slower response and recovery rates after the COVID-19 outbreak. The community close-off management was less effective for urban village residents, with a smaller abrupt reduction in mobility and their recovery rate increasing faster during the post-lockdown period. Therefore, urban village residents may have experienced greater limitations in adjusting travel with higher exposure risks during the pandemic, compared with commodity housing residents. The variations in mobility change are significantly affected by some inherent differences between these two groups, even after controlling for their socioeconomic and built environment features. These results provide important insights for designing mobility restriction policies for different housing groups and planning more resilient neighborhoods in the post-COVID era. • Adopting an interrupted time series quasi-experimental design to infer daily causal effects of COVID-19 • Comparing mobility effects of COVID-19 in urban villages and commodity housing communities • Urban village residents reduced their travel less, with slower response and recovery rates. • The community close-off management was less effective for urban village residents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02642751
Volume :
145
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cities
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174388013
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104711