Back to Search
Start Over
Use of Visible Spectral Index and Soybean Plant Variables to Study Hidden Nematicide Phytotoxicity.
- Source :
-
AgriEngineering . Dec2023, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p1737-1753. 17p. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Significant crop losses are due to plant-parasitic nematodes. Nematicides are expensive and potentially toxic to men, the environment, and plants. This study evaluated the hidden phytotoxicity effects of nematicides in soybeans. Two soybean cultivars (8473RSF and M7198IPRO) were evaluated with five nematicide treatments (biological, cadusaphos, abamectin, fluensulfone, and an untreated control) for changes in chlorophylls, biometrics, and spectral (TGI visible spectral index captured with a smartphone camera) variables to determine and anticipate the identification of plant stresses. Evaluations occurred 33, 47, and 66 days after sowing (DAS). The a/b chlorophyll proportion was greatest for M7198IPRO and cadusaphos. The chlorophyll variables did not present significant interactions or differences at 47 DAS, indicating that possible nematicide effects were transient and should be evaluated earlier than 33 DAS. Leaf area, leaf mass, and shoot mass were smaller for 8473RSF and outstanding for abamectin and fluensulfone. The response of the spectral index did not present significant interaction among the factors; however, at 33 and 47 DAS, the index was low for 8473RSF and lowest for cadusaphos only at 33 DAS. The correlations between the spectral index and other variables were significant and moderate for soybean total leaf area. Although no apparent phytotoxicity symptoms caused by nematicides were observed, the visible vegetation index generated using a smartphone camera can still improve crop management solutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 26247402
- Volume :
- 5
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- AgriEngineering
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 174400641
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering5040107