Impact of Modern Low Dose Involved Site Radiation Therapy on Normal Tissue Toxicity in Cervicothoracic Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Biophysical Study.

Simple Summary: The effects of reduced prescription doses on normal tissue toxicity in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphomas of the neck/thorax region remain unclear. Acute side effects, which already occur at low organ doses, can only be described to a limited extent by the models given in the literature. Nonetheless, the knowledge about these dose–response relationships is particularly important to predict an acute response in normal tissue adequately. Considering a robust normal tissue toxicity model, dose prescriptions and treatment plans can be optimized to increase the treatment quality and, thus, the outcome for the patient. This biophysical study aimed to determine fitting parameters for the Lyman–Kutcher–Burman (LKB) dose–response model for normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations of acute side effects and to investigate the impact of reduced radiation doses on the probability of their occurrence in supradiaphragmatic non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) irradiation. A cohort of 114 patients with NHL in the cervicothoracic region, treated between 2015 and 2021 at the University Hospitals of Münster, Hamburg, and Essen, with involved site radiation therapy (ISRT), were included. Among them, 68 patients with aggressive NHL (a-NHL) received consolidative radiation therapy with 24–54 Gy following (R-)CHOP chemotherapy. Additionally, 46 patients with indolent NHL (i-NHL) underwent radiotherapy with 22.5–45.0 Gy. Two treatment plans were prospectively created for each patient (a-NHL: 30.0/40.0 Gy; i-NHL: 24.0/30.0 Gy). NTCP were then calculated using the optimized LKB model. The adapted dose–response models properly predicted the patient's probability of developing acute side effects when receiving doses ≤ 50 Gy. In addition, it was shown that reduced radiation doses can influence the NTCP of acute side effects depending on the aggressiveness of NHL significantly. This study provided a foundation to prospectively assess the probability of adverse side effects among today's reduced radiation doses in the treatment of NHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]