Influence of endoscopists' expertise level on clinical outcomes after bridge‐to‐surgery stenting in obstructive colorectal cancer.

Background and Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effect of stenting‐related factors, including endoscopists' expertise, on clinical outcomes after bridge‐to‐surgery (BTS) stenting for obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: We analyzed BTS stenting‐related factors, including stenting expertise and the interval between stenting and surgery, in 233 patients (63 [13] years, 137 male) who underwent BTS stenting for obstructive CRC. We evaluated the influence of these factors on post‐BTS stenting clinical outcomes such as stent‐related complications and cancer recurrence. Results: The interval between stenting and surgery was ≤ 7 days in 79 patients (33.9%) and > 7 days in 154 patients (66.1%). BTS stenting was performed by endoscopists with ≤ 50, 51–100, and > 100 prior stenting experiences in 94, 43, and, 96 patients, respectively. The clinical success rate of BTS stenting was 93.1%. Stent‐related and postoperative complications developed in 19 (8.2%) and 20 (8.6%) patients, respectively. Cancer recurrence occurred in 76 patients (32.6%). Short BTS interval of ≤ 7 days increased the risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR], 2.61 [1.03–6.75]; P = 0.043). Endoscopists' stenting experience > 100 showed greater clinical success of stenting (OR, 5.50 [1.45–28.39]; P = 0.021) and fewer stent‐related complications (OR, 0.26 [0.07–0.80]; P = 0.028) compared with stenting experience ≤ 50. BTS stenting‐related factors did not affect long‐term oncological outcomes. Conclusion: Greater expertise of endoscopists was associated with better short‐term outcomes, including high stenting success rate and low rate of stent‐related complications after BTS stenting for obstructive CRC. An interval of > 7 days between BTS stenting and surgery was required to decrease postoperative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]