ASSESSMENT OF TWO APPROACHES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND ANALYSIS OF DIALLEL CROSS DESIGNS THROUGH INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS.

In this article we compared two approaches: one is Griffing approach for numerical components and other is Hyman's approach for graphical representation of the components through the mating design of Complete Diallel Cross design for p=5 parental lines. Griffing (1956) approach was a numerical approach based on the estimates of combining ability effects. Here use his fourth method. Hayman (1954) approach also have four components namely (i) complete, (ii) partial, (iii) over-dominance and (iv) no dominance. Hayman's approach based on the estimation of parts of variation. We use three mutually orthogonal Latin squares design of order 5 for the construction of mating designs. ANOVA and estimates of combining ability derived and analyzed. We demonstrate the numerical accuracy of the proposed design Griffing method I and Hayman's method by using Turnip data of 5x5 crosses of plant height. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]