Back to Search Start Over

Inverse magnetic fabric of remagnetized limestones in the Zaduo area, Eastern Qiangtang Terrane: Implications for oroclinal bending in the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis.

Authors :
Fu, Qiang
Yan, Maodu
Dekkers, Mark J.
Li, Bingshuai
Guan, Chong
Yu, Liang
Xu, Wanlong
Shen, Miaomiao
Xu, Zunbo
Source :
Tectonophysics. Jan2024, Vol. 871, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Magnetic fabric analysis is a common technique to assess the strain regime during mountain building processes. Here, we use this approach to evaluate the tectonic evolution of the Tibetan Plateau and the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis by analyzing the limestones of the Jurassic Buqu Formation in the Zaduo area, Eastern Qiangtang Terrane (China). These limestones were chemically remagnetized during the Cenozoic. For a proper assessment, it is relevant to understand how the mineralogy of the remagnetized limestones affects their magnetic fabric and how the magnetic fabric can improve our understanding of the tectonic strain and regional deformation. The role of the authigenic magnetite in the development of the magnetic fabric should thus be explored. Comparison of the bulk susceptibility (K m) with various natural and laboratory rock magnetic properties (K m versus natural remanent magnetization, K m versus saturation isothermal remanent magnetization, and K m versus saturation magnetization) indicates that susceptibility and remanences are both carried by authigenic magnetite. Most of the magnetite grains show axial ratios <1.3:1 according to the Néel diagram, and fall within the single-domain range based on the mass magnetic susceptibility (χ) and DC field-normalized anhysteretic remanent magnetization (χ ARM) ratio, giving rise to the inverse magnetic fabric observed. Twelve sites (120 specimens) are divided into four groups based on the magnetic fabric and rock magnetic behaviors. Overall, there is a clear trend of decreasing K m , natural remanent magnetization, saturation isothermal remanent magnetization, ferromagnetic percentage and shape parameter from Group I to IV. The K 1 axis of all four groups documents a NNE-SSW oriented compression during remagnetization, contrasting with the Eocene NE-SW compression in the Gongjue area farther east. This different compressional regime likely resulted in different rotations and structural trends surrounding the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis. • Authigenic magnetite explains magnetic behavior of Zaduo remagnetized limestones. • Single domain magnetite particles cause the inverse magnetic fabrics. • These fabrics document NNE-SSW oriented compression during Eocene remagnetization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00401951
Volume :
871
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Tectonophysics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174689340
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2023.230175