The Stability Transition From Stable to Unstable Frictional Slip With Finite Pore Pressure.

Pore fluids are ubiquitous throughout the lithosphere and are commonly invoked as the cause of induced seismicity and slow earthquakes. We perform lab experiments to address these questions for drained fault conditions and low pore pressure. We shear simulated faults at effective normal stress σn′ $\left({\sigma }_{n}^{\prime }\right)$ of 20 MPa and pore pressures Pp from 1 to 4 MPa. We document the full range of lab earthquake behaviors from slow slip to elasto‐dynamic rupture and show that slow slip can be explained by the slip rate dependence of the critical rheologic stiffness without dilatancy hardening or other fluid effects. Our fault permeabilities ranges from 10−18 to 10−17 m2 with an initial porosity of 0.1 and estimated fluid diffusion time ≈1 s. Slow slip and quasi‐dynamic fault motion may arise from high Pp at higher pressures but dilatancy strengthening is not a general requirement. Plain Language Summary: Earthquakes begin and propagate within the fluid‐saturated rocks of Earth's crust. Many investigators have suggested that high pore fluid pressure (Pp) is essential for slow earthquakes and tremor. These studies rely on the idea that changes in Pp can impact rupture propagation speed by dilatant volume increase during faulting with concurrent increases in fault effective normal stress. Thus, understanding the processes that produce slow‐slip versus dynamically propagating rupture is integral to seismic hazard forecasting. Here, we describe experiments on granular faults that produce the full spectrum of slip observed in nature. We measure the mechanical and hydraulic behavior of the faults and determine that frictional and fluid‐driven processes occur in conjunction. Importantly, we demonstrate that frictional processes are sufficient to explain slow‐slip when fluid migration is not inhibited. We demonstrate that for low pore fluid pressures, the full transition from slow slip to dynamic rupture events can be explained as a frictional effect via the critical rheologic stiffness. Key Points: The frictional stability transition does not require dilatant hardening for granular fault zones sheared at low pore pressuresSlow earthquakes and quasi‐dynamic fault slip can be explained by the strain‐rate dependence of the critical fault stiffness (Kc)For the effective normal stresses studied, pore pressure has a negligible impact on frictional stability and the mode of fault slip [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]