Back to Search Start Over

A unified buckling formulation for linear and nonlinear analysis of laminated plates using penalty based [formula omitted] FEM-HSDT model.

Authors :
Verma, Surendra
Gupta, Abha
Thakur, Babu Ranjan
Oguamanam, Donatus
Singh, B.N.
Source :
International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics. Mar2024, Vol. 159, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of pre-buckling boundary conditions and the type of nonlinearity for stress stiffening used in different linear and nonlinear buckling approaches is studied for laminated composite plates. The study is conducted using a C 0 finite element (FE) plate model, employing a unified C 1 higher-order shear deformation theory (HSDT). The set of governing equations is derived using the principle of virtual displacement and solved using the tangent-based arc-length method in conjunction with a simple branch switching technique. The performance of the present C 0 FE model is assessed through a validation exercise and comparison with results obtained via the use of ANSYS and, for linear analysis, Navier solution, as well as solutions available in the literature. The influence of the different in-plane loads, boundary conditions, side-to-thickness ratio, fiber orientation, types of imperfection and penalty stiffness matrix are also examined. The results show that the same boundary conditions must be utilized in both pre-buckling and linear eigenvalue analyses for accurate and realistic predictions of critical buckling loads, as confirmed from the nonlinear buckling analyses. Furthermore, the critical buckling loads obtained using Green–Lagrange nonlinearity are observed to be more conservative than those obtained using von Kármán nonlinearity. The nonlinear buckling approach is a generalized approach while the nonlinear eigenvalue approach has a limited range of application. • Importance of consistent pre-boundary conditions in pre-buckling analysis is highlighted. • Green–Lagrange strain is better than von Kármán strain for geometric stiffness matrix. • The superiority of the nonlinear buckling approach over the nonlinear eigenvalue approach is shown. • The significance of considering the penalty stiffness matrix for C1 HSDT in C0 FEM formulation is demonstrated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00207462
Volume :
159
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174708994
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2023.104619