Back to Search Start Over

Cellular Mass Response to Therapy Correlates With Clinical Response for a Range of Malignancies.

Authors :
Stevens, Mark M.
Kimmerling, Robert J.
Olcum, Selim
Vacha, Madeleine
LaBella, Rachel
Minnah, Anthony
Katsis, Katelin
Fujii, Juanita
Shaheen, Zayna
Sundaresan, Srividya
Criscitiello, Joseph
Niesvizky, Ruben
Raje, Noopur
Branagan, Andrew
Krishnan, Amrita
Jagannath, Sundar
Parekh, Samir
Sperling, Adam S.
Rosenbaum, Cara A.
Munshi, Nikhil
Source :
JCO Precision Oncology. 1/18/2023, Vol. 8, p1-11. 11p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer patients with advanced-stage disease have poor prognosis, typically having limited options for efficacious treatment, and genomics-based therapy guidance continues to benefit only a fraction of patients. Next-generation ex vivo approaches, such as cell mass-based response testing (MRT), offer an alternative precision medicine approach for a broader population of patients with cancer, but validation of clinical feasibility and potential impact remain necessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the clinical feasibility and accuracy of using live-cell MRT to predict patient drug sensitivity. Using a unified measurement workflow with a 48-hour result turnaround time, samples were subjected to MRT after treatment with a panel of drugs in vitro. After completion of therapeutic course, clinical response data were correlated with MRT-based predictions of outcome. Specimens were collected from 104 patients with solid (n = 69) and hematologic (n = 35) malignancies, using tissue formats including needle biopsies, malignant fluids, bone marrow aspirates, and blood samples. Of the 81 (78%) specimens qualified for MRT, 41 (51%) patients receiving physician-selected therapies had treatments matched to MRT. RESULTS: MRT demonstrated high concordance with clinical responses with an odds ratio (OR) of 14.80 (P =.0003 [95% CI, 2.83 to 102.9]). This performance held for both solid and hematologic malignances with ORs of 20.67 (P =.0128 [95% CI, 1.45 to 1,375.57]) and 8.20 (P =.045 [95% CI, 0.77 to 133.56]), respectively. Overall, these results had a predictive accuracy of 80% (P =.0026 [95% CI, 65 to 91]). CONCLUSION: MRT showed highly significant correlation with clinical response to therapy. Routine clinical use is technically feasible and broadly applicable to a wide range of samples and malignancy types, supporting the need for future validation studies. MRT predicts cancer patients' drug sensitivity with 80% accuracy, holding promise for clinical use across tumors & drug mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
24734284
Volume :
8
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
JCO Precision Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174870727
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.23.00349