Back to Search Start Over

Embodied, caring and disciplinary: A Foucauldian reading of 'process time' as constitutive of the biopolitical institution of the family.

Authors :
Foeken, Elsie
Source :
Time & Society. Feb2024, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p3-24. 22p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

'Process time' describes the recursive/fluid, social and embodied temporality that characterises much 'women's work'. Though this concept has proven highly useful to feminist analyses of caring and other feminised labour, there has arguably been a tendency for authors in this area to naturalise and valorise this temporality – particularly in relation to the abstract, economic and disciplinary time of the clock. I argue that this naturalisation or valorisation of process time flattens our understanding of feminised labour, and that a feminist social theory of time must recognise the potentially disciplinary forms process time can take. As such, this paper contributes to feminist analyses of time, gender and labour by arguing that the embodied, caring and processual temporality that circulates within modern families can be understood as fundamentally disciplinary. Drawing primarily on Foucauldian theory, as well as Sharon Hays' concept of 'intensive mothering', the paper argues that process time is central to the functioning of the family as a biopolitical institution, just as clock time is integral to the disciplinary mechanisms of the school, prison, barracks, etc. Specifically, it argues that the unique relations of power that circulate within the biopolitical family rely on a unique use of time: one that is intensive and oriented towards the rhythms of the physical body – that is, processual. Further, this disciplinary time is deeply and fundamentally feminine, as it operates (in its ideal form) primarily through the mother. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0961463X
Volume :
33
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Time & Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175196999
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X231176434