Impact of Faculty Mentorship in the Orthopedic Surgery Interest Group at a New Medical School: A Blueprint for Future Initiatives.

This study investigates the impact of faculty mentorship within an orthopedic surgery interest group (OSIG) at a new medical school in Texas. Through an observational survey of active OSIG members, the study found that faculty engagement significantly improved the effectiveness of the group and positively influenced students' overall medical school experience. After faculty involvement, OSIG event attendance tripled, and students' well-being and confidence in becoming competitive orthopedic surgery applicants nearly doubled. Mentorship emerged as the most crucial activity for career development, followed by clinical exposure and research. This highlights the importance of faculty involvement in interest groups, particularly in competitive specialties. The authors provide valuable insights and a blueprint for future initiatives at institutions aiming to establish and optimize similar groups. Objectives: Orthopedic surgery is a highly competitive field. The residency applicant pool is expected to grow with the increasing number of new medical schools in the United States, posing significant challenges for applicants. This study explored the impact of an engaged faculty mentor in an orthopedic surgery interest group (OSIG) at a new medical school and the impact it has on students. The study aimed to uncover the most valuable features of an OSIG at a new medical school to create a blueprint for other student-leaders and/or faculty in future initiatives. Methods: An observational study was conducted via survey responses from active OSIG members at a new medical school in Texas. Questions were mostly in a "before and after" format asking about students' perspectives of the group before and after the addition of an engaged faculty advisor. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: Twenty of 21 (95.2%) eligible OSIG members participated in the study. The survey results revealed that faculty engagement significantly enhanced the OSIG and its members' medical school experience. Following faculty involvement, average OSIG event attendance more than tripled, there was a statistically significant increase in medical student well-being, and confidence in their ability to be a competitive orthopedic surgery applicant nearly doubled. OSIG participation influenced their career interests significantly more after faculty engagement. A total of 93.3% of participants voted that they felt having an engaged faculty advisor is critical for the OSIG. Conclusions: Mentorship was identified as the most crucial activity for career development, followed by clinical exposure and research. The study provides valuable insights for new medical schools in establishing and optimizing OSIGs and potentially other interest groups, particularly in competitive specialties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]