Back to Search Start Over

Optimal cutoff value of the dry eye-related quality-of-life score for diagnosing dry eye disease.

Authors :
Zou, Xinrong
Nagino, Ken
Okumura, Yuichi
Midorikawa-Inomata, Akie
Eguchi, Atsuko
Yee, Alan
Fujimoto, Keiichi
Miura, Maria
Sung, Jaemyoung
Huang, Tianxiang
Fujio, Kenta
Akasaki, Yasutsugu
Nakao, Shintaro
Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
Inomata, Takenori
Source :
Scientific Reports. 2/26/2024, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1-7. 7p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to determine the optimal cutoff values of the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS) questionnaire for diagnosing dry eye disease (DED) and classifying DED severities. Participants completed the DEQS questionnaire, the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (J-OSDI) questionnaire, and DED examinations. DED was diagnosed according to the 2016 Asia Dry Eye Society diagnostic criteria based on DED symptoms (J-OSDI ≥ 13 points) and tear film breakup time ≤ 5 s. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the optimal cutoff values of the DEQS summary score for detecting DED and grading its severity. Among 427 patients, 296 (69.3%) and 131 (30.7%) were diagnosed with DED and non-DED, respectively. ROC analysis determined an optimal cutoff value of 15.0 points for DED diagnosis, with 83.5% sensitivity, 87.0% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.915. The positive and negative predictive values for DEQS ≥ 15.0 points were 93.6% and 69.9%, respectively. DEQS cutoff values of 15.0, 20.0, and 26.8 points could be accepted for severity classification of DED subjective symptoms in clinical use and represent mild, moderate, and severe DED, respectively. Conclusively, the optimal cutoff values of DEQS enable DED detection and subjective symptom severity classification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20452322
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Scientific Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175825648
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55358-1