Back to Search Start Over

Long-term survival after cardiac arrest in patients undergoing emergent coronary angiography.

Authors :
Vidal-Calés, Pablo
Ortega-Paz, Luis
Brugaletta, Salvatore
García, John
Rodés-Cabau, Josep
Angiolillo, Dominick J.
Regueiro, Ander
Freixa, Xavier
Abdul-Jawad, Omar
Cepas-Guillén, Pedro Luis
Andrea, Rut
de Diego, Oriol
Tizón-Marcos, Helena
Tomás-Querol, Carlos
Gómez-Hospital, Joan Antoni
Carrillo, Xavier
Cárdenas, Mérida
Rojas, Sergio
Muñoz-Camacho, Juan Francisco
García-Picart, Joan
Source :
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. Mar2024, Vol. 60, p18-26. 9p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

To determine long-term survival of patients after cardiac arrest undergoing emergent coronary angiography and therapeutic hypothermia. We analysed data from patients treated within the regional STEMI Network from January 2015 to December 2020. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at median follow-up. Secondary endpoints were periprocedural complications (arrhythmias, pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock, mechanical complication, stent thrombosis, reinfarction, bleeding) and 6-month all-cause death. A landmark analysis was performed, studying two time periods; 0–6 months and beyond 6 months. From a total of 24,125 patients in the regional STEMI network, 494 patients who suffered from cardiac arrest were included and divided into two groups: treated with (n = 119) and without therapeutic hypothermia (n = 375). At median follow−up (16.0 [0.2–33.3] months), there was no difference in the adjusted mortality rate between groups (51.3 % with hypothermia vs 48.0 % without hypothermia; HR adj 1.08 95%CI [0.77–1.53]; p = 0.659). There was a higher frequency of bleeding in the hypothermia group (6.7 % vs 1.1 %; OR adj 7.99 95%CI [2.05–31.2]; p = 0.002), without difference for the rest of periprocedural complications. At 6-month follow−up, adjusted all-cause mortality rate was similar between groups (46.2 % with hypothermia vs 44.5 % without hypothermia; HR adj 1.02 95%CI [0.71–1.47]; p = 0.900). Also, no differences were observed in the adjusted mortality rate between 6 months and median follow−up (9.4 % with hypothermia vs 6.3 % without hypothermia; HR adj 2.02 95%CI [0.69–5.92]; p = 0.200). In a large cohort of patients with cardiac arrest within a regional STEMI network, those treated with therapeutic hypothermia did not improve long−term survival compared to those without hypothermia. • In patients withcardiac arrest with suspected STEMI, hypothermia did not improve long−term survival. • In a landmark analysis, hypothermia was not associated with better survival between 0 and 6 months or beyond. • There were no prespecified subgroups in whom hypothermia was associated with better long-term survival. • The maintained low survival rates after cardiac arrest should lead to a investigation of efficient therapeutic interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15538389
Volume :
60
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175849136
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2023.09.008