Artificial intelligence based cardiotocogram assessment during labor.

• An AI method was trained to predict fetal heartrate. • This method is expected to fail for abnormal CTG. • The prediction error correlates to FIGO interpretation. • This method might therefore be used in clinical decision support. To assess whether artificial intelligence, inspired by clinical decision-making procedures in delivery rooms, can correctly interpret cardiotocographic tracings and distinguish between normal and pathological events. Study Design : A method based on artificial intelligence was developed to determine whether a cardiotocogram shows a normal response of the fetal heart rate to uterine activity (UA). For a given fetus and given the UA and previous FHR, the method predicts a fetal heart rate response, under the assumption that the fetus is still in good condition and based on how that specific fetus has responded so far. We hypothesize that this method, when having only learned from fetuses born in good condition, is incapable of predicting the response of a compromised fetus or an episode of transient fetal distress. The (in)capability of the method to predict the fetal heart rate response would then yield a method that can help to assess fetal condition when the obstetrician is in doubt. Cardiotocographic data of 678 deliveries during labor were selected based on a healthy outcome just after birth. The method was trained on the cardiotocographic data of 548 fetuses of this group to learn their heart rate response. Subsequently it was evaluated on 87 fetuses, by assessing whether the method was able to predict their heart rate responses. The remaining 43 cardiotocograms were segment-by-segment annotated by three experienced gynecologists, indicating normal, suspicious, and pathological segments, while having access to the full recording and neonatal outcome. This future knowledge makes the expert annotations of a quality that is unachievable during live interpretation. The comparison between abnormalities detected by the method (only using past and present input) and the annotated CTG segments by gynecologists (also looking at future input) yields an area under the curve of 0.96 for the distinction between normal and pathological events in majority-voted annotations. The developed method can distinguish between normal and pathological events in near real-time, with a performance close to the agreement between three gynecologists with access to the entire CTG tracing and fetal outcome. The method has a strong potential to support clinicians in assessing fetal condition in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]