Back to Search Start Over

Workforce resilience supporting staff in managing stress: A coherent breathing intervention for the long‐term care workforce.

Authors :
DeGraves, Brittany S.
Titley, Heather
Duan, Yinfei
Thorne, Trina E.
Banerjee, Sube
Ginsburg, Liane
Salma, Jordana
Hegadoren, Kathleen
Angel, Cybele
Keefe, Janice
Lanius, Ruth
Estabrooks, Carole A.
Source :
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Mar2024, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p753-766. 14p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Staff in long‐term care (LTC) homes have long‐standing stressors, such as short staffing and high workloads. These stressors increased during the COVID‐19 pandemic; better resources are needed to help staff manage stress and well‐being. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a simple stress management strategy (coherent breathing). Methods: We conducted a pre–post intervention study to evaluate a self‐managed coherent breathing intervention from February to September 2022. The intervention included basic (breathing only) and comprehensive (breathing plus a biofeedback device) groups. Six hundred eighty‐six participants were initially recruited (359 and 327 in the comprehensive and basic groups respectively) from 31 LTC homes in Alberta, Canada. Two hundred fifty‐four participants completed pre‐and post‐intervention questionnaires (142 [55.9%] in comprehensive and 112 [44.1%] in basic). Participants were asked to use coherent breathing based on a schedule increasing from 2 to 10 min daily, 5–7 times a week over 8 weeks. Participants completed self‐administered online questionnaires pre‐ and post‐intervention to assess outcomes—stress, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, resilience, insomnia, compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout. We used a mixed‐effects regression model to test the main effect of time (pre‐ and post‐intervention) and group while testing the interaction between time and group and controlling for covariates. Results: We found statistically significant changes from pre‐ to post‐intervention in stress (b = −2.5, p < 0.001, 95% CI = −3.1, −1.9), anxiety (b = −0.5, p < 0.001, 95% CI = −0.7, −0.3), depression (b = −0.4, p < 0.001, 95% CI = −0.6, −0.2), insomnia (b = −1.5, p < 0.001, 95% CI = −2.1, −0.9), and resilience (b = 0.2, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.1, 0.2). We observed no statistically significant differences between the two intervention groups on any outcome. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that coherent breathing is a promising strategy for improving stress‐related outcomes and resilience. This intervention warrants further, more rigorous testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00028614
Volume :
72
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176119224
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18727