Back to Search Start Over

Problems With Co-Funding in Canada.

Authors :
Tyers, Mike
Brown, Eric
Andrews, David W.
Bergeron, John J. M.
Boone, Charles
Bremner, Roderick
Bussey, Howard A.
Cross, James C.
Davies, Julian E.
Desjardins, Michel
Dick, John E.
Dumont, Daniel J.
Durocher, Daniel
Ellison, Michael J.
Golding, G. Brian
Gray, Michael W.
Harrington, Lea A.
Hieter, Philip A.
Johnston, Gerald
Kelvin, David J.
Source :
Science. 6/24/2005, Vol. 308 Issue 5730, p1867-1867. 4/5p.
Publication Year :
2005

Abstract

This article reports that the Canadian Federal government has prudently invested substantial new resources in research operations and infrastructure, thereby bringing the level of research support in Canada on par with that of most other G8 countries and enabling a world-class research enterprise. Much of this renewed commitment to research, however, is in the form of "co-funded" programs. In Canada, co-funding schemes typically require an equal or greater match of funds from an independent partner, either local, provincial, or foreign governments. Genome Canada, the primary Canadian funding agency for genome-scale projects, has winnowed its latest round of team applications solely on the basis of the perceived financial suitability of the co-funding source. In general, grants are best awarded solely on the basis of scientific peer review, and funded in full without matches, strings, or contingencies that depend on outside agents. By eschewing scientific excellence as the primary consideration, co-funded programs imperil scientific credibility and fail to engage the breadth and depth of national scientific expertise.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00368075
Volume :
308
Issue :
5730
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
17618991
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.308.5730.1867b