Multi-objective optimization scheduling and flexibility margin study in integrated energy systems based on different strategies.

Integrated Energy Systems (IES) serve as an effective solution to address grid fluctuations. However, mainstream IES still adhere to established supply strategies such as thermal and electrical non-conversion (TENC), heat determined by power (HDP), and power determined by heat (PDH). These strategies overlook the additional flexibility generated by the synergy between electricity and heat, preventing the full realization of their advantages in supporting the grid. This paper proposes a Flexible Scheduling (FS) operational strategy for IES that maximizes the utilization of flexibility resources to meet the demands of heating, cooling, and electricity while maintaining grid stability. The superiority of this strategy is analyzed through an IES multi-objective optimization scheduling model and a comprehensive flexibility margin model. The results of a case study indicate that the FS strategy reduces total costs by 19.9% compared to TENC, 16.6% compared to HDP, and 5.2% compared to PDH. It exhibits the strongest support for the grid, increasing the overall flexibility margin of IES by 40.5% compared to TENC, 12.7% compared to HDP, and 8.2% compared to PDH. The FS-based IES operational strategy proposed in this paper contributes significantly to the flexible and economical operation of IES. • Established a multi-objective optimization scheduling model for integrated energy systems that considers both economic and environmental factors. • Established a model for the flexibility margin of system electricity and heat. • Proposed the system's "flexible scheduling" operating strategy and validated it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]