LIES of omission: complex observation processes in ecology.

In ecology, the observation process (how we collect data) can be as complex as the biological process we are investigating. Failure to account for complex observation processes leads to uncertainty, biased inference and poor predictions, resulting in misleading research results. Often, field scientists are best placed to describe observation problems that occur but are excluded from discussions about how to tackle these problems statistically. Statisticians are often unaware of the nuances of observation processes leading to the problems being ignored, or tackled on a case-by-case basis. We propose a typology of observation problems and inferential solutions, hence facilitating the linkages between field protocols and statistical treatments. Advances in statistics mean that it is now possible to tackle increasingly sophisticated observation processes. The intricacies and ambitious scale of modern data collection techniques mean that this is now essential. Methodological research to make inference about the biological process while accounting for the observation process has expanded dramatically, but solutions are often presented in field-specific terms, limiting our ability to identify commonalities between methods. We suggest a typology of observation processes that could improve translation between fields and aid methodological synthesis. We propose the LIES framework (defining observation processes in terms of issues of Latency, Identifiability, Effort and Scale) and illustrate its use with both simple examples and more complex case studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]