Back to Search Start Over

A feasibility cadaver study for placing screws in various pelvic osseous fracture pathways using a robotic arm.

Authors :
Smith, Austin F.
Lendhey, Matin
Winfield, Jalen
Mahoney, Jonathan M.
Bucklen, Brandon S.
Carlson, Jon B.
Source :
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. Apr2024, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p1457-1463. 7p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: The use of a robotic system for the placement of pedicle screws in spine surgeries is well documented in the literature. However, there is only a single report in the United States describing the use of a robotic system to place two screws in osseous fixation pathways (OFPs) commonly used in the treatment of pelvic and acetabular fractures in a simulated bone model. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the use of a robotic system to place screws in multiple, clinically relevant OFPs in a cadaveric model and to quantitatively measure accuracy of screw placement relative to the preoperative plan. Methods: A single cadaveric specimen was obtained for the purpose of this study. All surrounding soft tissues were left intact. Screws were placed in OFPs, namely iliosacral (IS), trans-sacral (TS), Lateral Compression-II (LC-II), antegrade anterior column (AC) and antegrade posterior column (PC) of the right hemipelvis using standard, fluoroscopically assisted percutaneous or mini-open technique. Following the placement of screws into the right hemipelvis using standard techniques, screws were planned and placed in the same OFPs of the contralateral hemipelvis using the commercially available ExcelsiusGPS® robotic system (Globus Medical Inc., Audubon, PA). After robotic-assisted screw placement, a post-procedure CT scan was obtained to evaluate actual screw placement against the pre-procedure plan. A custom-made image analysis program was devised to measure screw tip/tail offset and angular offset on axial and sagittal planes. Results: For different OFPs, the mean tip offset, tail offset and angular offsets were 1.6 ± 0.9 mm (Range 0.0–3.6 mm), 1.4 ± 0.4 mm (Range 0.3–2.5 mm) and 1.1 ± 0.4° (Range 0.5–2.1), respectively. Conclusion: In this feasibility study, surgeons were able to place screws into the clinically relevant fracture pathways of the pelvis using ExcelsiusGPS® for robotic-assisted surgery. The measured accuracy was encouraging; however, further investigation is needed to demonstrate that robotic-assisted surgery can be used to successfully place the screws in the bony corridors of the pelvis to treat traumatic pelvic injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16338065
Volume :
34
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176338228
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03821-6