Evaluating Radar Reflector Localisation in Targeted Axillary Dissection in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Simple Summary: Neoadjuvant therapy, which reduces advanced breast tumours before surgery, is common in medical practice. However, accurately mapping lymph nodes post-therapy is challenging and affects staging accuracy. One solution is marking the affected lymph nodes in the armpit before therapy, then removing the marked nodes during surgery via targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines standard sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with pre-neoadjuvant marked lymph node biopsy (MLNB). Radar reflector localisation (RRL) is a promising technology for locating tumours. Our study found that using RRL in TAD is reliable and accurate. This reduces the need for extensive armpit surgery in responsive patients, minimising surgical complications and improving their quality of life without compromising cancer outcomes. SAVI SCOUT® or radar reflector localisation (RRL) has proven accurate in localising non-palpable breast and axillary lesions, with minimal interference with MRI. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD), combining marked lymph node biopsy (MLNB) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), is becoming a standard post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for node-positive early breast cancer. Compared to SLNB alone, TAD reduces the false negative rate (FNR) to below 6%, enabling safer axillary surgery de-escalation. This systematic review evaluates RRL's performance during TAD, assessing localisation and retrieval rates, the concordance between MLNB and SLNB, and the pathological complete response (pCR) in clinically node-positive patients post-NST. Four studies (252 TAD procedures) met the inclusion criteria, with a 99.6% (95% confidence [CI]: 98.9–100) successful localisation rate, 100% retrieval rate, and 81% (95% CI: 76–86) concordance rate between SLNB and MLNB. The average duration from RRL deployment to surgery was 52 days (range:1–202). pCR was observed in 42% (95% CI: 36–48) of cases, with no significant migration or complications reported. Omitting MLNB or SLNB would have under-staged the axilla in 9.7% or 3.4% (p = 0.03) of cases, respectively, underscoring the importance of incorporating MLNB in axillary staging post-NST in initially node-positive patients in line with the updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. These findings underscore the excellent efficacy of RRL in TAD for NST-treated patients with positive nodes, aiding in accurate axillary pCR identification and the safe omission of axillary dissection in strong responders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]