Back to Search
Start Over
A large language model–based generative natural language processing framework fine‐tuned on clinical notes accurately extracts headache frequency from electronic health records.
- Source :
-
Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain . Apr2024, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p400-409. 10p. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Objective: To develop a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm that can accurately extract headache frequency from free‐text clinical notes. Background: Headache frequency, defined as the number of days with any headache in a month (or 4 weeks), remains a key parameter in the evaluation of treatment response to migraine preventive medications. However, due to the variations and inconsistencies in documentation by clinicians, significant challenges exist to accurately extract headache frequency from the electronic health record (EHR) by traditional NLP algorithms. Methods: This was a retrospective cross‐sectional study with patients identified from two tertiary headache referral centers, Mayo Clinic Arizona and Mayo Clinic Rochester. All neurology consultation notes written by 15 specialized clinicians (11 headache specialists and 4 nurse practitioners) between 2012 and 2022 were extracted and 1915 notes were used for model fine‐tuning (90%) and testing (10%). We employed four different NLP frameworks: (1) ClinicalBERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) regression model, (2) Generative Pre‐Trained Transformer‐2 (GPT‐2) Question Answering (QA) model zero‐shot, (3) GPT‐2 QA model few‐shot training fine‐tuned on clinical notes, and (4) GPT‐2 generative model few‐shot training fine‐tuned on clinical notes to generate the answer by considering the context of included text. Results: The mean (standard deviation) headache frequency of our training and testing datasets were 13.4 (10.9) and 14.4 (11.2), respectively. The GPT‐2 generative model was the best‐performing model with an accuracy of 0.92 (0.91, 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]) and R2 score of 0.89 (0.87, 0.90, 95% CI), and all GPT‐2–based models outperformed the ClinicalBERT model in terms of exact matching accuracy. Although the ClinicalBERT regression model had the lowest accuracy of 0.27 (0.26, 0.28), it demonstrated a high R2 score of 0.88 (0.85, 0.89), suggesting the ClinicalBERT model can reasonably predict the headache frequency within a range of ≤ ± 3 days, and the R2 score was higher than the GPT‐2 QA zero‐shot model or GPT‐2 QA model few‐shot training fine‐tuned model. Conclusion: We developed a robust information extraction model based on a state‐of‐the‐art large language model, a GPT‐2 generative model that can extract headache frequency from EHR free‐text clinical notes with high accuracy and R2 score. It overcame several challenges related to different ways clinicians document headache frequency that were not easily achieved by traditional NLP models. We also showed that GPT‐2–based frameworks outperformed ClinicalBERT in terms of accuracy in extracting headache frequency from clinical notes. To facilitate research in the field, we released the GPT‐2 generative model and inference code with open‐source license of community use in GitHub. Additional fine‐tuning of the algorithm might be required when applied to different health‐care systems for various clinical use cases. Plain Language Summary: We developed a novel artificial intelligence program that can automatically and accurately extract headache frequency from doctors' notes. Figuring out how often someone gets headaches is important as it helps doctors see how bad the problem is and if treatments are working. Our method, using a powerful program called Generative Pre‐Trained Transformer‐2, worked better than older ways and could make big data migraine research easier. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *MIGRAINE prevention
*LANGUAGE & languages
*DOCUMENTATION
*CROSS-sectional method
*HUMAN services programs
*RESEARCH funding
*HEADACHE
*FIELD notes (Science)
*ARTIFICIAL intelligence
*NATURAL language processing
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*RETROSPECTIVE studies
*TERTIARY care
*QUANTITATIVE research
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*ELECTRONIC health records
*MATHEMATICAL models
*MEDICAL records
*ACQUISITION of data
*NEUROLOGY
*CONCEPTUAL structures
*INFORMATION retrieval
*THEORY
*CONFIDENCE intervals
*ALGORITHMS
*MEDICAL referrals
*REGRESSION analysis
*EVALUATION
RESEARCH evaluation
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00178748
- Volume :
- 64
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 176763789
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14702