Back to Search Start Over

Women's Experiences with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Targeted Breast Ultrasound for Focal Breast Complaints: A Survey Study.

Authors :
Siebers, Carmen C.N.
Appelman, Linda
Appelman, Peter T.M.
Go, Shirley
van Oirsouw, Marja C.J.
Broeders, Mireille J.M.
Mann, Ritse M.
Source :
Journal of Women's Health (15409996). Apr2024, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p499-501. 6p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Owing to its high sensitivity, as concluded in the Breast UltraSound Trial (BUST), targeted ultrasound (US) now seems a promising accurate stand-alone modality for diagnostic evaluation of breast complaints. This approach implies omission of bilateral digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in women with clearly benign US findings. Within BUST, radiologists started with US followed by DBT. This side-study investigates women's experiences with DBT, their main motivation to undergo diagnostic imaging, and their view on US as a stand-alone modality. Methods: A subset of BUST participants completed a questionnaire on their DBT experiences, reason for undergoing diagnostic assessment, and view on US-only diagnostics. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses. Results: In total, 778 of 838 women (response rate 92.8%) were included (M = 47, SD = 11.16). Of them, 16.8% reported no burden of DBT, 33.5% slight burden, 31.0% moderate, and 12.7% severe burden. Furthermore, 13% reported no pain, 35.3% slight pain, 33.2% moderate, and 11.3% severe pain. Moreover, 88.3% indicated that the most important reason for breast assessment was explanation of their complaint and to rule out breast cancer, whereas 3.2% wanted to "check" both breasts. And 82.4% reported satisfaction with US only in case of a nonmalignancy. Conclusions: Our study shows that most women in the diagnostic setting experience at least slight-to-moderate DBT-related burden and pain, and that explanation for their symptoms is their main interest. Also, the majority report satisfaction with US only in case of nonmalignant findings. However, exploration of women's perspectives outside this study is needed as our participants all underwent both examinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15409996
Volume :
33
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Women's Health (15409996)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176780832
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.0502