Back to Search Start Over

Prediction and extensive analysis of MWCNT-MgO/oil SAE 50 hybrid nano-lubricant rheology utilizing machine learning and genetic algorithms to find ideal attributes.

Authors :
Baghoolizadeh, Mohammadreza
Pirmoradian, Mostafa
Sajadi, S. Mohammad
Salahshour, Soheil
Baghaei, Sh.
Source :
Tribology International. Jul2024, Vol. 195, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Genetic algorithms and machine learning methods can accurately anticipate hybrid nanofluids' complicated rheology. Scientists and engineers can understand hybrid materials by using genetic algorithms to optimize and machine learning to discover complicated relationships between input variables and rheological responses. As a continuation of the author's previous research on the rheological properties of a nano-lubricant based on engine oil and hybrid nanoparticles, this study uses machine learning and genetic algorithms to theoretically assess the dynamic viscosity of the MWCNT-MgO/oil SAE 50 hybrid nanofluid and identify optimal properties. MLR, D-Tree, Ridge, PLR, SVM, Lasso, ECR, GPR, and MPR are used for regression analysis. Best multi-objective issue solutions are represented by the Pareto front. The NSGA-II algorithm determines the Pareto front. The MPR and NSGA-II algorithms provide a Pareto front with the most precise optimal spot boundaries. The Weighted Sum Method (WSM) simplifies multi-objective problems into single-objective problems, making optimal solutions easier to find. The results show that the maximum margin of deviation for μ nf and τ is − 2.5615 and − 5.239, respectively. According to the Taylor chart, the best μ nf mode for R, RMSE and STD is equal to 0.9983, 7.6639, 130.0056. Also, these values for τ are equal to 0.9996, 15.4515, and 516.0219. • Rheological behavior of the MWCNT-MgO/SAE 50 hybrid nanofluid was studied. • use of meta-heuristic algorithm NSGA-Ⅱ to find the most optimal point that satisfies μ nf and τ. • Optimal solution is represented by a set of points known as the Pareto front. • The best algorithm in terms of the Taylor diagram for μ nf output is the MPR algorithm, and the worst is the Lasso algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0301679X
Volume :
195
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Tribology International
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176785380
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2024.109582