Back to Search Start Over

Linked-color imaging with or without artificial intelligence for adenoma detection: a randomized trial.

Authors :
Miyaguchi, Kazuya
Tsuzuki, Yoshikazu
Hirooka, Nobutaka
Matsumoto, Hisashi
Ohgo, Hideki
Nakamoto, Hidetomo
Imaeda, Hiroyuki
Source :
Endoscopy. 2024, Vol. 56 Issue 5, p376-383. 8p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important indicator of colonoscopy quality and colorectal cancer incidence. Both linked-color imaging (LCI) with artificial intelligence (LCA) and LCI alone increase adenoma detection during colonoscopy, although it remains unclear whether one modality is superior. This study compared ADR between LCA and LCI alone, including according to endoscopists' experience (experts and trainees) and polyp size. Methods Patients undergoing colonoscopy for positive fecal immunochemical tests, follow-up of colon polyps, and abdominal symptoms at a single institution were randomly assigned to the LCA or LCI group. ADR, adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, number of adenomas per location, and adenoma size were compared. Results The LCA (n=400) and LCI (n=400) groups showed comparable cecal intubation and withdrawal times. The LCA group showed a significantly higher ADR (58.8% vs. 43.5%; P<0.001) and mean (95%CI) APC (1.31 [1.15 to 1.47] vs. 0.94 [0.80 to 1.07]; P<0.001), particularly in the ascending colon (0.30 [0.24 to 0.36] vs. 0.20 [0.15 to 0.25]; P=0.02). Total number of nonpolypoid-type adenomas was also significantly higher in the LCA group (0.15 [0.09 to 0.20] vs. 0.08 [0.05 to 0.10]; P=0.02). Small polyps (≤5, 6–9mm) were detected significantly more frequently in the LCA group (0.75 [0.64 to 0.86] vs. 0.48 [0.40 to 0.57], P<0.001 and 0.34 [0.26 to 0.41] vs. 0.24 [0.18 to 0.29], P=0.04, respectively). In both groups, ADR was not significantly different between experts and trainees. Conclusions LCA was significantly superior to LCI alone in terms of ADR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0013726X
Volume :
56
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176856109
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2239-8145