Back to Search Start Over

Differences in Donor Heart Acceptance by Race and Gender of Patients on the Transplant Waiting List.

Authors :
Breathett, Khadijah
Knapp, Shannon M.
Lewsey, Sabra C.
Mohammed, Selma F.
Mazimba, Sula
Dunlay, Shannon M.
Hicks, Albert
Ilonze, Onyedika J.
Morris, Alanna A.
Tedford, Ryan J.
Colvin, Monica M.
Daly, Richard C.
Source :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. 4/23/2024, Vol. 331 Issue 16, p1379-1386. 8p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

This cohort study assesses differences in donor heart acceptance by transplant center teams for Black and White men and women on the transplant waiting list in the US. Importance: Barriers to heart transplant must be overcome prior to listing. It is unclear why Black men and women remain less likely to receive a heart transplant after listing than White men and women. Objective: To evaluate whether race or gender of a heart transplant candidate (ie, patient on the transplant waiting list) is associated with the probability of a donor heart being accepted by the transplant center team with each offer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the United Network for Organ Sharing datasets to identify organ acceptance with each offer for US non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black) and non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White) adults listed for heart transplant from October 18, 2018, through March 31, 2023. Exposures: Black or White race and gender (men, women) of a heart transplant candidate. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was heart offer acceptance by the transplant center team. The number of offers to acceptance was assessed using discrete time-to-event analyses, nonparametrically (stratified by race and gender) and parametrically. The hazard probability of offer acceptance for each offer was modeled using generalized linear mixed models adjusted for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables. Results: Among 159 177 heart offers with 13 760 donors, there were 14 890 candidates listed for heart transplant; 30.9% were Black, 69.1% were White, 73.6% were men, and 26.4% were women. The cumulative incidence of offer acceptance was highest for White women followed by Black women, White men, and Black men (P <.001). Odds of acceptance were less for Black candidates than for White candidates for the first offer (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84) through the 16th offer. Odds of acceptance were higher for women than for men for the first offer (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39-1.68) through the sixth offer and were lower for the 10th through 31st offers. Conclusions and Relevance: The cumulative incidence of heart offer acceptance by a transplant center team was consistently lower for Black candidates than for White candidates of the same gender and higher for women than for men. These disparities persisted after adjusting for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables, possibly suggesting racial and gender bias in the decision-making process. Further investigation of site-level decision-making may reveal strategies for equitable donor heart acceptance. Key Points: Question: Is the race or gender of a patient on the heart transplant waiting list associated with the probability of a donor heart being accepted by the transplant center team with each offer? Findings: In this cohort study of 159 177 heart offers with 13 760 donors and 14 890 candidates, there was a statistically significant difference among the race and gender strata in the cumulative incidence functions, with the cumulative incidence of heart offer acceptance being consistently highest for White women followed by Black women, White men, and Black men. Meaning: The findings suggest that race and gender are significantly associated with the probability of donor heart acceptance and that investigation is needed to change modifiable factors contributing to these disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00987484
Volume :
331
Issue :
16
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176898523
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.0065