Back to Search Start Over

Intravoxel incoherent motion assessment of liver fibrosis staging in MASLD.

Authors :
Ren, Hao
Xu, Hui
Yang, Dawei
Tong, Xiaofei
Zhao, Xinyan
Wang, Qianyi
Sun, Yameng
Ou, Xiaojuan
Jia, Jidong
You, Hong
Wang, Zhenchang
Yang, Zhenghan
Source :
Abdominal Radiology. May2024, Vol. 49 Issue 5, p1411-1418. 8p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Partial correlation analysis was performed to account for the interference of steatosis changes and inflammatory factors, to determine the true correlation between fibrosis and IVIM parameters (Dfast, Dslow, and F), and to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of IVIM for liver fibrosis. Methods: A total of 106 patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) examined by IVIM from November 2016 to November 2023 at our hospital were retrospectively included. Preliminary analysis of each IVIM parameter and correlations with pathological findings were performed using Spearman correlation analysis, and partial correlation analysis was used to exclude the interference of other pathological factors, thus yielding the true correlations between IVIM parameters (Dfast, Dslow, and F) and pathology. The diagnostic efficacy of IVIM parameters for diagnosing MASLD was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Spearman correlation analysis of all the IVIM parameters revealed correlations with steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning. Partial correlation analysis indicated that Dfast was correlated with the pathological fibrosis stage (r = − 0.593, P < 0.001), Dslow was correlated with the pathological steatosis score (r = − 0.313, P < 0.05), and F was correlated with the pathological fibrosis stage and steatosis score (r = − 0.456 and 0.255, P < 0.001 and P < 0.05). In the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis, significant hepatic fibrosis, advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, Dfast achieved areas under the ROC curve of 0.763, 0.801, 0.853, and 0.897, respectively. The threshold values for diagnosing different fibrosis stages using Dfast (10–3 mm2/s) were 57.613, 54.587, 52.714, and 51.978, respectively. Conclusion: According to our partial correlation analysis, there was a moderate correlation between Dfast and F according to fibrosis stage, and Dfast was not influenced by inflammation or steatosis when diagnosing fibrosis in MASLD patients. A relatively close Dfast threshold is insufficient for accurately and noninvasively assessing various stages of MASLD fibrosis. In clinical practice, this approach can be considered an alternative method for the preliminary assessment of fibrosis in MASLD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2366004X
Volume :
49
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Abdominal Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177371130
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04207-w