Deconstructing migration studies and identity studies: The need for an alternative scientific lens.

This article explores the rise of identity studies and the potential limitations and consequences of focusing on cultural differences. It introduces the term "IDology" to describe the study of identities and argues that it can align with neoliberalism and consumerism. The article also discusses the complexities of identity formation and the relationship between individuals and their social context. It suggests that ethno-cultural and religious resurgences among minorities may be a response to the limitations imposed by neoliberal governance. Additionally, the article explores the emergence of ultra-politics and the securitization of migration, which contribute to civilizational polarization and the erosion of democratic deliberation. The text introduces the concept of "sub-politics," referring to non-conventional forms of politics individuals use to navigate polarizing aspects of ultra-politics. It argues that social scientists should focus on examining socio-economic, political, psychological, and spatial factors that give rise to the formation of new communities, rather than solely emphasizing cultural and religious differences. The author suggests a post-IDology thinking that magnifies similarities among individuals facing similar challenges, rather than amplifying differences. [Extracted from the article]