Back to Search Start Over

Identifying the priority areas for ecological protection considering ecological connectivity and ecosystem integrity: A case study of Xianyang City, China.

Authors :
Gu, Tong
Tong, Yawen
Wang, Shiyu
You, Zheng
Li, Dingyi
Jiang, Yun
Rafaqat, Atiyyah
Wang, Cheng
Zhang, Qingfeng
Source :
Ecological Indicators. Jun2024, Vol. 163, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

• Introduced multi-tiered method to identify ecological protection priority areas. • Incorporated ecological lands with excellent ecosystem integrity into EPPAs. • The width of ecological corridors was identified based on the proportion of land use. • Aggregate Polygons tool was utilized to aggregate fragmented areas. • An ecological protection method was developed for medium-sized city. Identifying ecological protection priority areas (EPPAs) in municipal areas is essential for accurate ecological restoration and ensuring sustainable regional development. Xianyang represents a typical medium-sized city that is currently grappling with the dual challenges of ecological restoration and urban development. This study employed a multi-criteria method to evaluate ecological importance, considering both ecosystem services and ecological vulnerability. Based on this, ecological corridors and pinch points that enhance ecological connectivity were delineated using the circuit theory. Subsequently, the integrity of ecosystems is assessed from structural and functional perspectives to ensure their health and stability. With the support of Geographic Information System (GIS) technology, the three important areas for ecological protection were integrated to designate EPPAs. The results showed that: (1) the extremely important area spans 1956.44 km2, primarily made up of forests and grasslands. (2) There were found to be 19 ecological sources, 26 ecological corridors, and 23 ecological pinch points. (3) With excellent ecosystem integrity, the region was dominated by eco-lands, which accounted for 2692.71 km2. (4) In the end, this study identified 3328.83 km2 of EPPAs, 32.65 % of the study area. These are primarily located in the northern mountains and major watersheds. Human activities are found as the most important factor for the overall spatial variations in the area. A multi-level framework was developed to establish a continuous, comprehensive, and systematic method for identifying EPPAs, thereby enhancing ecological restoration, protection, and the sustainable use of regional ecosystems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1470160X
Volume :
163
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Ecological Indicators
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177390862
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112102