Conventional versus Hepatic Arteriography and C-Arm CT-Guided Ablation of Liver Tumors (HepACAGA): A Comparative Analysis.

Simple Summary: Catheter-assisted ablations have shown significant improvements in the outcomes of percutaneous thermal ablation for liver cancer. A novel approach within this category is the Hepatic Arteriography and C-Arm CT-Guided Ablation (HepACAGA) technique, which integrates C-arm CT hepatic arteriography with C-arm guided navigation. This cohort study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of the HepACAGA technique compared to conventional ultrasound/CT-guided thermal ablation in treating hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastasis. A total of 68 patients with 120 tumors undergoing HepACAGA and 53 patients with 78 tumors undergoing conventional ablation were included. The HepACAGA technique demonstrated superior outcomes: lower rates of local tumor recurrence, longer local tumor recurrence-free survival, and fewer procedure-related complications. These findings suggest that HepACAGA is a safer and more effective ablation technique in liver cancer treatment compared to conventional ablation methods. Purpose: Hepatic Arteriography and C-Arm CT-Guided Ablation of liver tumors (HepACAGA) is a novel technique, combining hepatic–arterial contrast injection with C-arm CT-guided navigation. This study compared the outcomes of the HepACAGA technique with patients treated with conventional ultrasound (US) and/or CT-guided ablation. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, all consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with conventional US-/CT-guided ablation between 1 January 2015, and 31 December 2020, and patients treated with HepACAGA between 1 January 2021, and 31 October 2023, were included. The primary outcome was local tumor recurrence-free survival (LTRFS). Secondary outcomes included the local tumor recurrence (LTR) rate and complication rate. Results: 68 patients (120 tumors) were included in the HepACAGA cohort and 53 patients (78 tumors) were included in the conventional cohort. In both cohorts, HCC was the predominant tumor type (63% and 73%, respectively). In the HepACAGA cohort, all patients received microwave ablation. Radiofrequency ablation was the main ablation technique in the conventional group (78%). LTRFS was significantly longer for patients treated with the HepACAGA technique (p = 0.015). Both LTR and the complication rate were significantly lower in the HepACAGA cohort compared to the conventional cohort (LTR 5% vs. 26%, respectively; p < 0.001) (complication rate 4% vs. 15%, respectively; p = 0.041). Conclusions: In this study, the HepACAGA technique was safer and more effective than conventional ablation for HCC and CRLM, resulting in lower rates of local tumor recurrence, longer local tumor recurrence-free survival and fewer procedure-related complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]