Back to Search Start Over

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation differences by sex – The role of arrest recognition.

Authors :
Munot, Sonali
Bray, Janet E.
Redfern, Julie
Bauman, Adrian
Marschner, Simone
Semsarian, Christopher
Denniss, Alan Robert
Coggins, Andrew
Middleton, Paul M.
Jennings, Garry
Angell, Blake
Kumar, Saurabh
Kovoor, Pramesh
Vukasovic, Matthew
Bendall, Jason C.
Evens, T.
Chow, Clara K.
Source :
Resuscitation. Jun2024, Vol. 199, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

• Females were less likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) • In public locations, lower arrest recognition partly explained the sex difference. • Reasons for the observed differences should be investigated, and public education and training should address this issue. • Bystander AED use was lower in females, mostly explained by fewer female arrests in a public location. To assess whether bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) differed by patient sex among bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). This study is a retrospective analysis of paramedic-attended OHCA in New South Wales (NSW) between January 2017 to December 2019 (restricted to bystander-witnessed cases). Exclusions included OHCA in aged care, medical facilities, with advance care directives, from non-medical causes. Multivariate logistic regression examined the association of patient sex with bystander CPR. Secondary outcomes were OHCA recognition, bystander AED application, initial shockable rhythm, and survival outcomes. Of 4,491cases, females were less likely to receive bystander CPR in private residential (Adjusted Odds ratio [AOR]: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.70–0.95) and public locations (AOR: 0.58, 95%CI:0.39–0.88). OHCA recognition during the emergency call was lower for females arresting in public locations (84.6% vs 91.6%, p = 0.002) and this partially explained the association of sex with bystander CPR (∼44%). This difference in recognition was not observed in private residential locations (p = 0.2). Bystander AED use was lower for females (4.8% vs 9.6%, p < 0.001); however, after adjustment for location and other covariates, this relationship was no longer significant (AOR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.60–1.12). Females were less likely to be in an initial shockable rhythm (AOR: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.44–0.61), but more likely to survive the event (AOR: 1.34, 95%CI: 1.15–1.56). There was no sex difference in survival to hospital discharge (AOR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.77–1.19). OHCA recognition and bystander CPR differ by patient sex in NSW. Research is needed to understand why this difference occurs and to raise public awareness of this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03009572
Volume :
199
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Resuscitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177537206
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110224