The 340B Program and oral specialty drugs for advanced prostate cancer.

Introduction: Expensive oral specialty drugs for advanced prostate cancer can be associated with treatment disparities. The 340B program allows hospitals to purchase medications at discounts, generating savings that can improve care of the socioeconomically disadvantaged. This study assessed the effect of hospital 340B participation on advanced prostate cancer. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with advanced prostate cancer from 2012 to 2019. The primary outcome was use of an oral specialty drug. Secondary outcomes included monthly out‐of‐pocket costs and treatment adherence. We evaluated the effects of 1) hospital 340B participation, 2) a regional measure vulnerability, the social vulnerability index (SVI), and 3) the interaction between hospital 340B participation and SVI on outcomes. Results: There were 2237 and 1100 men who received care at 340B and non‐340B hospitals. There was no difference in specialty drug use between 340B and non‐340B hospitals, whereas specialty drug use decreased with increased SVI (odds ratio, 0.95, p =.038). However, the interaction between hospital 340B participation and SVI on specialty drug use was not significant. Neither 340B participation, SVI, or their interaction were associated with out‐of‐pocket costs. Although hospital 340B participation and SVI were not associated with treatment adherence, their interaction was significant (p =.020). This demonstrated that 340B was associated with better adherence among socially vulnerable men. Conclusions: The 340B program was not associated with specialty drug use in men with advanced prostate cancer. However, among those who were started on therapy, 340B was associated with increased treatment adherence in more socially vulnerable men. Men with advanced prostate cancer who received care at a hospital participating in the 340B program had similar utilization of oral specialty drugs as those cared for at nonparticipating hospitals, regardless of social vulnerability. However, care at a 340B hospital was associated with better treatment adherence among those who started on therapy. Further refinement of the program could focus on providing hospitals specific guidance on using savings to benefit the most vulnerable patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]