Back to Search Start Over

Developing a core outcome set for acetabular fractures: a systematic review protocol.

Authors :
Schulz, Denise
Deichsel, Adrian
Jordan, Martin C.
Windolf, Joachim
Raschke, Michael J.
Neubert, Anne
Source :
Systematic Reviews. 6/5/2024, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1-5. 5p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials investigating acetabular fractures are heterogeneous in their investigated outcomes and their corresponding measurements. Standardization may facilitate comparability and pooling of research results, which would lead to an increase in knowledge about the optimal treatment of acetabular fractures, resulting in long-term evidence-based treatment decisions and improvements in patient care. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the reported outcomes and their measurements from studies on treatments for acetabular fractures to develop a core outcome set which contains the most relevant outcome measures to be included in future studies. Methods: Studies published in English and German including patients aged 16 years and older, with a surgically treated acetabular fracture, will be included. Studies with nonsurgical treatment, pathologic fractures, polytraumatized patients, and patients younger than 16 years of age will be excluded because other outcomes may be of interest in these cases. Any prospective and retrospective study will be included. Systematic reviews will be excluded, but their included studies will be screened for eligibility. The literature will be searched on MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. Risk of selective reporting of outcomes will be assessed using the Outcome Reporting Bias in Trials classification system. Heterogeneously defined outcomes that measure the same outcome will be grouped and subsequently categorized into outcome domains using the taxonomy of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative. Discussion: It is expected that a high number of studies will be included, and many outcomes will be identified using different definitions and measurement instruments. A limitation of this systematic review is that only previously investigated outcomes will be detected, thus disregarding potentially relevant outcomes. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022357644 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20464053
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Systematic Reviews
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177714324
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02571-8