Back to Search Start Over

Comprehensive radiation shield minimizes operator radiation exposure in coronary and structural heart procedures.

Authors :
Rizik, David G.
Gosselin, Kevin P.
Burke, Robert F.
Goldstein, James A.
Source :
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. Jul2024, Vol. 64, p70-75. 6p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel comprehensive shield designed to minimize radiation exposure (RE) to Physicians performing coronary and structural heart procedures. The Protego™ radiation shielding system (Image Diagnostics Inc., Fitchburg, Ma) is designed to provide comprehensive protection from RE and has been State certified sufficient to allow operators to perform procedures without orthopedically burdensome lead aprons. This single center two-group cohort study assessed the efficacy of this shield in a large number of cardiac procedures (coronary and structural), comparing operator RE compared to standard protection methods (personal lead apparel and "drop down" shield). The Protego™ system reduced operator RE by 99 % compared to Standard Protection. RE was significantly lower at both "Head" level by thyroid median dose 0.0 (0.0, 0,0) vs 5.7 (2.9, 8.2) μSv (p < 0.001), as well as waist dose 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) vs 10.0 (5.0, 16.6) μSv (p < 0.001). "Zero" Total RE was documented by Raysafe™ in 64 % (n = 32) of TAVR cases and 73.2 % (n = 183) of the coronary cases utilizing Protego™. In contrast, standard protection did not achieve "Zero" exposure in a single case. These dramatic differences in RE were achieved despite higher fluoroscopy times in the Protego™ arm (11.9 ± 8.6 vs 14.3 ± 12.5 min, p = 0.015). Per case procedural exposure measured by Dose Area Product was higher in the Protego™ group compared to standard protection (115.4 ± 139.2 vs 74.9 ± 69.3, p < 0.001). The Protego™ shield provides total body RE protection for operators performing both coronary and structural heart procedures. This shield allows procedural performance without the need for personal lead aprons and has potential to reduce catheterization laboratory occupational health hazards. • The catheterization laboratory predisposes to occupational health hazards. • Lead apron use underlies the prevalence of orthopedic maladies in interventionists. • Until recently, there have been few advances in catheterization laboratory protection technology. • Novel comprehensive shielding systems have been validated in early studies to provide excellent radiation protection. • Recent system refinements offer potentially even greater degrees of protection when compared to standard protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15538389
Volume :
64
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177753469
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.02.015