Outcomes of Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma, with or without Prior Cervical Excision Procedure.

Simple Summary: The impact of a prior cervical excisional procedure on the oncologic outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy is not established. Smaller retrospective studies suggest that conization prior to the performance of radical hysterectomy may be associated with lower risk of tumor relapse, especially for patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy. We utilized a large hospital-based database and identified patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1 disease who had primary surgical treatment. Approximately one in three patients had a prior excisional procedure performed within 3 months of radical surgery. We demonstrated that the performance of an excisional procedure prior to radical hysterectomy may be associated with better overall survival. For patients who had a prior excisional procedure, minimally invasive surgery was not associated with worse overall survival compared to laparotomy even after controlling for confounders. Objective: To investigate the impact of a prior cervical excisional procedure on the oncologic outcomes of patients with apparent early-stage cervical carcinoma undergoing radical hysterectomy. Methods: The National Cancer Database (2004–2015) was accessed, and patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical cancer who had a radical hysterectomy with at least 10 lymph nodes (LNs) removed and a known surgical approach were identified. Patients who did and did not undergo a prior cervical excisional procedure (within 3 months of hysterectomy) were selected for further analysis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated following the generation of Kaplan–Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control a priori-selected confounders. Results: A total of 3159 patients were identified; 37.1% (n = 1171) had a prior excisional procedure. These patients had lower rates of lymphovascular invasion (29.2% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.014), positive LNs (6.7% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), and a tumor size >2 cm (25.7% vs. 56%, p < 0.001). Following stratification by tumor size, the performance of an excisional procedure prior to radical hysterectomy was associated with better OS even after controlling for confounders (aHR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.66). The rate of minimally invasive surgery was higher among patients who had a prior excisional procedure (61.5% vs. 53.2%, p < 0.001). For these patients, performance of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was not associated with worse OS (aHR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.66, 2.82). Conclusions: For patients undergoing radical hysterectomy, preoperative cervical excision may be associated with a survival benefit. For patients who had a prior excisional procedure, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was not associated with worse overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]