Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.

MLA

Porcari, Irene, et al. “Clinician Perspectives on Hysterectomy versus Uterine Preservation in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 166, no. 1, July 2024, pp. 173–89. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15343.

APA

Porcari, I., Zorzato, P. C., Bosco, M., Garzon, S., Magni, F., Salvatore, S., Franchi, M. P., & Uccella, S. (2024). Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 166(1), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15343

Chicago

Porcari, Irene, Pier Carlo Zorzato, Mariachiara Bosco, Simone Garzon, Francesca Magni, Stefano Salvatore, Massimo P. Franchi, and Stefano Uccella. 2024. “Clinician Perspectives on Hysterectomy versus Uterine Preservation in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 166 (1): 173–89. doi:10.1002/ijgo.15343.