Back to Search Start Over

Evaluating the Potential of Carbon Black for Safening of Herbicides in Soil.

Authors :
Szmigielski, Anna M.
Greer, Ken
Schoenau, Jeff J.
Source :
Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis. 2024, Vol. 55 Issue 15, p2259-2266. 8p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Finely divided carbon char products offer a cost-effective method for the safening of herbicides in soil. In this investigation, two contrasting carbon char sources: Virgin Activated Charcoal (VAC) and Recovered Carbon Black (RCB) products were evaluated for safening of metsulfuron, sulfentrazone and pyroxasulfone herbicides in soil using sugar beet bioassay, and of rimsulfuron using perennial ryegrass bioassay. Plants were grown for seven days in WhirlPack® bags in soil with added carbon char product and added herbicide, and the root or shoot lengths were measured. The VAC was more efficacious in herbicide safening than the RCB. For the VAC, concentrations in soil (wt/wt) as low as 0.375% fully deactivated metsulfuron, sulfentrazone and pyroxasulfone, while for the RCB product a gradual degree of safening was observed, except for pyroxasulfone that was completely deactivated by both VAC and RCB. The VAC at concentrations of 3% and above fully deactivated rimsulfuron, while RCB did not. The two carbon char products examined in this study had different physical properties, of which the specific surface area (91 and 515 m2 g−1 for the RCB and VAC, respectively) and specific surface area of pores (75 and 247 m2 g−1 for RCB and VAC, respectively) showed the greatest difference. Higher surface area promoting greater sorption may explain more effective deactivation of herbicides by the VAC. To obtain the same degree of herbicide safening, more RCB would be required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00103624
Volume :
55
Issue :
15
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178068672
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2024.2352395